Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

 

Identification Tag

Exclusion of Identification Evidence at Trial

Exclusion of Identification Evidence at Trial

Exclusion of identification evidence at trial can be a turning point for a criminal case. Getting the judge to agree that alleged eyewitnesses should not testify that they saw the defendant at the scene of the crime requires an evaluation of all the circumstances of the identification. In a 1977 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States explained the test for excluding identification evidence. The decision, Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977), confirmed earlier case law in explaining why a police officer viewing a single photograph and then making an in-court identification did not violate the Due Process Clause...

Continue reading

Problems with Identification Testimony in Oklahoma

Problems with Identification Testimony in Oklahoma

There are many ways to challenge identification testimony in court, because eyewitness statements are inherently unreliable tools to establish people’s identities. Numerous studies show that witnesses misidentify people in lineups and in the courtroom for many different reasons. In recent years, challenges to convictions based on mistaken eyewitnesses have resulted in many innocent people freed. Some common problems with eyewitness testimony: Witnesses are distracted by weapons, moving vehicles, or clothing (like a hat pulled down low) Poor lighting at the scene, or poor vision on the part of the witness Stress and anxiety during the crime and afterward Witness bias or...

Continue reading